Mental health
Family violence and sexual assault
NCLEX adult violence chapter: IPV screening and leaving-risk, safety planning, sexual assault evidence and kit consent, and how reporting differs from child and elder maltreatment.
Clesial Editorial TeamReviewed by Clesial Editorial Team, Clinical Content Review
Contents6 sections
Adult violence items test privacy, language after disclosure, and evidence rules that do not override consent. Child maltreatment reporting is in Paediatric skin, ENT, and safeguarding. Elder maltreatment is in Elder abuse and polypharmacy. Legal reporting mechanics also sit in Client rights, restraints, and reporting.
Intimate partner violence: screen, respond, do not trap
Intimate partner violence is a pattern of physical, sexual, psychological, or economic control. Injuries that do not match the story, delay in seeking care, a partner who answers every question, and a client who looks to the partner before speaking are cues. Screen in private. If the partner refuses to step out, that itself is data; get help from security or another staff member rather than forcing a confrontation that isolates the client further in that moment.
After a disclosure, the therapeutic response is belief and options, not an interrogation. “Thank you for telling me. You did not cause this. You have choices, and I can help you look at them.” Avoid “why do you stay,” “what did you do,” and cheerleading that they must leave tonight. Leaving is often the highest-risk period because control is threatened. A rushed ultimatum can send the client back without a bag, documents, or a plan, and can escalate lethality. Your job is a safety plan they own: a packed bag if it is safe to hide one, important documents, a code word with a friend, hotline numbers memorized or hidden, and where to go if they decide. They may decline every resource today. Document the offer and stay available. That is not failure. Forcing a competent adult into a shelter against their will is.
| Cue or task | Nursing stance |
|---|---|
| Partner will not leave the exam room | Do not screen with them present; create a private moment |
| Disclosure of hitting or threats | Believe; no blame; assess current safety and children in the home |
| Client not ready to leave | Safety plan and resources; do not withdraw care |
| Children are being hurt or witnessing and the law requires a report | Mandatory report pathway; tell the client what you must do when that is the rule |
| Pregnancy plus IPV | Higher lethality concern; same privacy rules; obstetric team plus resources |
Safety
Do not hand the client printed IPV materials to take home if the partner searches bags. Offer memorized numbers, a safe device, or materials they can hide.
Sexual assault: care first, kit only with consent
After sexual assault the priorities are safety, injuries, pregnancy and infection risk, and then evidence if the client wants it. Speak in private. Do not make them repeat the story to every staff member. A SANE or trained examiner collects the kit when available; your job is consent, chain of custody as trained, and not destroying evidence by accident.
- Stabilize life threats and obvious injuries. Assault does not pause ABCs.
- Ask before you have them bathe, change clothes, brush teeth, or eat and drink if a kit may still be wanted.
- Explain the kit: what it is, that it is optional, that they can stop any step, and that medical treatment is not a trade for evidence.
- Consent is timed and specific. An unconscious client does not get a kit “while we have the chance” unless law and policy in the stem say otherwise; default is wait for consent.
- Preserve clothing in paper as taught, label, and hand off per protocol. Do not put wet evidence in plastic that grows mold as the stem frames it.
Prophylaxis for pregnancy and STIs, hepatitis/HIV pathways, and tetanus follow orders and the client’s consent. Offer advocacy and a support person. Documentation is factual: what you saw, what they said in their words, what care they accepted or declined. The distractor that looks tidy is showering them for dignity before they have decided about a kit, or telling them they “have to” complete evidence to get prophylaxis. They do not.
| Issue | Rule as tested |
|---|---|
| Kit consent | Informed, optional, stepwise; not bundled as “sign this or no care” |
| Shower / clothes | Hold if a kit is still on the table and they have not decided |
| Who examines | Trained examiner when available; same-gender if the client asks and staffing allows |
| Minors | Follow facility and state reporting; child sexual abuse is not this chapter’s adult-kit map |
Priority map
| Picture | First move |
|---|---|
| Partner answering every question | Private interview; do not screen in front of them |
| IPV disclosure, not ready to leave | Believe; safety plan; resources; no ultimatum |
| Assault, wants medical care, unsure about kit | Treat; explain kit; they choose evidence steps |
| Client asking to shower before deciding on a kit | Explain evidence first; then honor the choice |
| Child injury pattern that does not match | Paediatric safeguarding / mandatory report chapter |
Revision
Must know
- 1Screen and interview the client alone. A partner who will not leave the room is a control cue, not a helpful historian.
- 2Believe the disclosure. Do not ask what they did to provoke it. Document facts, quotes, and injuries without judgmental labels.
- 3Leaving is often the most dangerous window. Do not make “just leave tonight” the only plan. Offer a safety plan, hotline, and resources; the client chooses when.
- 4Competent adults: you support and report per facility/state rules, but you do not police a competent adult back into a shelter against their will. Children and many older/dependent adults trigger mandatory reporting. Those maps are Paediatric skin/ENT/safeguarding and Elder abuse.
- 5Sexual assault: privacy, safety, medical care first. Do not have the client bathe, change, or eat/drink if a kit is still possible and they may want it. Kit collection needs informed consent; they can consent to care without consenting to every evidence step.
Memory hooks
Alone, believe, plan, do not order “leave now”
Interview without the partner, validate, safety-plan. The most dangerous time is often when they try to go.
Kit is consent, not a favor you do to the clothes
Evidence collection is optional, timed, and owned by the client. Medical care is not held hostage to a kit.
How it's tested
Stems ask who stays in the room for screening, what to say after a disclosure, why “leave tonight” can be wrong, whether to let a client shower before a kit, or who consents to evidence collection. Distractors interview with the partner present, blame the client, force a shelter, or wash the client “for comfort” before they decide about a kit.
More in mental health
All topics- Mental health foundationsNCLEX psych foundations: defense mechanisms, nurse-client relationship phases, milieu safety, crisis steps, eating-disorder care, and borderline boundaries.Read
- Opioid and substance useNCLEX addictions chapter: opioid overdose and naloxone, opioid withdrawal cues, stimulant intoxication, sedative overdose, and recovery safety teaching.Read
- Substance use and withdrawalNCLEX alcohol chapter: withdrawal progression, delirium tremens priorities, benzodiazepines, thiamine before glucose, and disulfiram teaching.Read
- Therapeutic communicationNCLEX communication chapter: therapeutic vs nontherapeutic responses, silence and presence, teach-back, grief stages, PTSD cues, and end-of-life comfort.Read