Skip to main contentMain content

Mental health

Family violence and sexual assault

NCLEX adult violence chapter: IPV screening and leaving-risk, safety planning, sexual assault evidence and kit consent, and how reporting differs from child and elder maltreatment.

Clesial Editorial TeamReviewed by Clesial Editorial Team, Clinical Content Review

Contents6 sections

Adult violence items test privacy, language after disclosure, and evidence rules that do not override consent. Child maltreatment reporting is in Paediatric skin, ENT, and safeguarding. Elder maltreatment is in Elder abuse and polypharmacy. Legal reporting mechanics also sit in Client rights, restraints, and reporting.

Intimate partner violence: screen, respond, do not trap

Intimate partner violence is a pattern of physical, sexual, psychological, or economic control. Injuries that do not match the story, delay in seeking care, a partner who answers every question, and a client who looks to the partner before speaking are cues. Screen in private. If the partner refuses to step out, that itself is data; get help from security or another staff member rather than forcing a confrontation that isolates the client further in that moment.

After a disclosure, the therapeutic response is belief and options, not an interrogation. “Thank you for telling me. You did not cause this. You have choices, and I can help you look at them.” Avoid “why do you stay,” “what did you do,” and cheerleading that they must leave tonight. Leaving is often the highest-risk period because control is threatened. A rushed ultimatum can send the client back without a bag, documents, or a plan, and can escalate lethality. Your job is a safety plan they own: a packed bag if it is safe to hide one, important documents, a code word with a friend, hotline numbers memorized or hidden, and where to go if they decide. They may decline every resource today. Document the offer and stay available. That is not failure. Forcing a competent adult into a shelter against their will is.

Cue or taskNursing stance
Partner will not leave the exam roomDo not screen with them present; create a private moment
Disclosure of hitting or threatsBelieve; no blame; assess current safety and children in the home
Client not ready to leaveSafety plan and resources; do not withdraw care
Children are being hurt or witnessing and the law requires a reportMandatory report pathway; tell the client what you must do when that is the rule
Pregnancy plus IPVHigher lethality concern; same privacy rules; obstetric team plus resources

Safety

Do not hand the client printed IPV materials to take home if the partner searches bags. Offer memorized numbers, a safe device, or materials they can hide.

After sexual assault the priorities are safety, injuries, pregnancy and infection risk, and then evidence if the client wants it. Speak in private. Do not make them repeat the story to every staff member. A SANE or trained examiner collects the kit when available; your job is consent, chain of custody as trained, and not destroying evidence by accident.

  1. Stabilize life threats and obvious injuries. Assault does not pause ABCs.
  2. Ask before you have them bathe, change clothes, brush teeth, or eat and drink if a kit may still be wanted.
  3. Explain the kit: what it is, that it is optional, that they can stop any step, and that medical treatment is not a trade for evidence.
  4. Consent is timed and specific. An unconscious client does not get a kit “while we have the chance” unless law and policy in the stem say otherwise; default is wait for consent.
  5. Preserve clothing in paper as taught, label, and hand off per protocol. Do not put wet evidence in plastic that grows mold as the stem frames it.

Prophylaxis for pregnancy and STIs, hepatitis/HIV pathways, and tetanus follow orders and the client’s consent. Offer advocacy and a support person. Documentation is factual: what you saw, what they said in their words, what care they accepted or declined. The distractor that looks tidy is showering them for dignity before they have decided about a kit, or telling them they “have to” complete evidence to get prophylaxis. They do not.

IssueRule as tested
Kit consentInformed, optional, stepwise; not bundled as “sign this or no care”
Shower / clothesHold if a kit is still on the table and they have not decided
Who examinesTrained examiner when available; same-gender if the client asks and staffing allows
MinorsFollow facility and state reporting; child sexual abuse is not this chapter’s adult-kit map

Priority map

PictureFirst move
Partner answering every questionPrivate interview; do not screen in front of them
IPV disclosure, not ready to leaveBelieve; safety plan; resources; no ultimatum
Assault, wants medical care, unsure about kitTreat; explain kit; they choose evidence steps
Client asking to shower before deciding on a kitExplain evidence first; then honor the choice
Child injury pattern that does not matchPaediatric safeguarding / mandatory report chapter

Revision

Must know

  1. 1Screen and interview the client alone. A partner who will not leave the room is a control cue, not a helpful historian.
  2. 2Believe the disclosure. Do not ask what they did to provoke it. Document facts, quotes, and injuries without judgmental labels.
  3. 3Leaving is often the most dangerous window. Do not make “just leave tonight” the only plan. Offer a safety plan, hotline, and resources; the client chooses when.
  4. 4Competent adults: you support and report per facility/state rules, but you do not police a competent adult back into a shelter against their will. Children and many older/dependent adults trigger mandatory reporting. Those maps are Paediatric skin/ENT/safeguarding and Elder abuse.
  5. 5Sexual assault: privacy, safety, medical care first. Do not have the client bathe, change, or eat/drink if a kit is still possible and they may want it. Kit collection needs informed consent; they can consent to care without consenting to every evidence step.

Memory hooks

  • Alone, believe, plan, do not order “leave now”

    Interview without the partner, validate, safety-plan. The most dangerous time is often when they try to go.

  • Kit is consent, not a favor you do to the clothes

    Evidence collection is optional, timed, and owned by the client. Medical care is not held hostage to a kit.

How it's tested

Stems ask who stays in the room for screening, what to say after a disclosure, why “leave tonight” can be wrong, whether to let a client shower before a kit, or who consents to evidence collection. Distractors interview with the partner present, blame the client, force a shelter, or wash the client “for comfort” before they decide about a kit.

Next in Mental healthMental health conditions

More in mental health